Release Note
ZenTalk


[Experience Sharing] [TECH] Raw Format For Smartphone Photos: is it worth it? Or better JPEG?

451 2
Jump to specific floor
Latest Post
1#
Last edited by suraj0606 on 2017/4/30 01:11



Hello Zenfans.
Photographers can’t live without it, and a majority of smartphone fans will have heard about it a lot.
We’re talking about the RAW format. In this article, we outline the differences compared to normal JPEG images and explain where and when the RAW format is useful.

"JPEG photos gather the values of the three color channels with a precision of 8 bits. This is the equivalent of 256 values, from complete darkness, to light.  By modifying the values in the 3 channels, we have a total of 16.78 million possible colors. As the human eye is able to distinguish between around 20 million colors, 8 bits appears to be more than sufficient for viewing photos."

Advantages of the RAW format:

often want to edit our photos afterwards, for example, to brighten a dark area of the image. When we increase the brightness of the area in the post editing process, dials appear on the image. These demonstrate the so-called color-banding effects in color gradients as can be seen, for example, in the photos of the sky.
"RAW photos store 10, 12 or 14 bits per color channel, which are 1,024, 4,096 or even 16,384 levels of color (instead of 256). By using the dials, this is the equivalent of between a billion and 4 billion different colors, and offers much more capacity for post editing." The dark or light areas of the image play an important role, as often in the case of JPEG formats, it’s not possible to obtain more details.

This is the same photo, on the left in JPEG format and on the right in RAW format. In both images, the same color corrections have been made. While significant changes are noticeable in the JPEG image, the RAW version has more effective results, with a smoother color transition.

Another huge advantage of the RAW format is that, when image information is stored no additional effects are implemented (Image sharpening, noise reduction, white balance or contrast, among others). With JPEG images, these corrections are ‘burned’ into the image. So, when the camera has not captured the white balance while taking the photo very well it’s more difficult to edit at a later stage.

The histogram shows the distribution of dark and light pixels. With the JPEG format (right) ripples can be seen in the curve of the sun. Image information has been lost which is important for color fringe effects
Disadvantages of the RAW format


The freedom of RAW images can also be a disadvantage: in this format it’s not possible to quickly take a photo or to send one to the printer. Instead, they must be processed by a RAW converter. This is usually called ‘revealing’ and the RAW photos are called ‘digital negatives’, an analogy for reel photographs.
With ISO 1600, it’s possible to reduce the noise in JPEG photos (left). Without Noise Reduction, the RAW photo looks like it’s covered with sugar granules (center). If you want to avoid this, noise reduction should be activated (right)

Correcting the noise in an image or marks on the lens (like distortion and color aberrations) can be a tedious job. This should be taken into account. Generally, there’s the possibility of taking a photo in RAW and JPEG formats simultaneously. For those who don’t want to make any corrections or any retouches to the photo, they can simply use JPEG photos. For more complicated photography, RAW photos are available as a backup copy.
If you look closely, you’ll see that the RAW image on the left has a slight purple color in the transition between light and dark. This type of mark comes from color aberrations and usually are corrected by the camera’s JPEG processing algorithms.

The only problem is storage space. While JPEG photos on the Huawei Mate 9 usually occupy between 2 and 6 MB, the RAW archives can take up to 24 MB. So, 1000 photos would take up, instead of 4 GB, 30 GB in RAW + JPEG formats. Another problem is the storage speed. Nota ll quick-fire photo methods are compatible with the RAW format, meaning that you can’t maintain the shot frequencies that the JPEG method allows.

Conclusion

In summary, you must decide for yourselves whether this would bother you or not. From my own experience, I can say that the RAW format is worth it, as long as storage space isn’t a problem and that speed is totally irrelevant. The editing and post-processing possibilities are far superior. Any photography mishap due to some kind of technical error due to light exposure can be saved thanks to the RAW format. Therefore, I would say that the additional storage space that I had to use was totally worth it.

Who else is waiting to Use RAW format in Zenfone 3 Zoom

Which one is better for you? RAW or JPEG? Comment down below.




2#
Superb Share brother.
It helps me understand more about Raw images.
3#
himanshu1966 posted on 2017/4/30 13:11
Superb Share brother.
It helps me understand more about Raw images.

Thanks brother.. Hope you too post some good stuff..
Advanced mode
You need to login first Login | Register Now

Points policy of this forum

Archiver|Mobile ver.|

Fast reply Top Return to list
Share link list
Share by pm